Topic · AI play therapy session notes
AI play therapy session notes drafted on your Mac — no minor PHI transcripts leave your device
Play therapy session notes are observation-driven, not transcript-driven — the clinical record reflects what the therapist observed, what play themes emerged, and what those themes mean in the context of the child's treatment goals, not a verbatim exchange of what was said. A generic AI scribe that produces SOAP notes from dialogue transcripts is not built for this workflow. TherapyDraft is built for the observation-focused documentation that child-centered, directive, and sandtray play therapy require — and it runs entirely on your Mac, because audio and transcripts of sessions with minor clients should not be held by a cloud vendor whose records exist independently of the practice's own chart.
TL;DR
TherapyDraft drafts play therapy session notes locally on your M-series Mac — no minor PHI audio uploaded to any cloud AI service. Supports child-centered, directive, sandtray, and filial therapy documentation formats. The draft captures play themes, materials selected, affect and regulation observations, verbal disclosures, and caregiver segments. The clinician reviews and adds clinical interpretation before signing. $39/month Solo, $29/seat/month Group (3+). 10-session free trial, no card required.
What play therapy session notes need to document
Play therapy notes differ from adult psychotherapy notes in a structural way: most of the session content is behavioral and symbolic rather than verbal. The clinical significance of a play therapy session is carried in what the child did — what materials they selected, what play narrative they enacted, how their affect shifted across the session — not primarily in what they said. A note framework built around dialogue transcript produces a thin, incomplete record for play therapy because it misses most of what happened in the room.
A well-formed play therapy progress note typically includes:
- Modality and approach. Child-centered (nondirective), directive, sandtray/sandplay, narrative play therapy, Theraplay, filial therapy, or integrated. The modality governs what the note is organized around and what clinical observations are significant.
- Play themes observed. The dominant symbolic themes that emerged during the session — control and mastery, nurturing and caretaking, aggression and conflict, isolation, rescue and protection, regression. In child-centered approaches, themes are observed and reflected without direction; in directive approaches, the therapist introduces structured activities and the theme is named by the design. Both need to appear in the note.
- Materials selected and how used. In child-centered play therapy, material selection is clinically significant — what the child reaches for in a free-choice environment reflects the therapeutic work they need to do. The note records what was used and in what way: the sandbox, specific figurines, the art materials, the puppet theater, the dress-up bin. In directive approaches the clinician chooses the materials; the note records which activity and the child's engagement.
- The child's affect arc. Where was the child emotionally at the start of the session, what shifts occurred mid-session, and where did the session close? Regulation capacity — whether the child was able to modulate arousal, tolerate transitions, contain distress during difficult play themes — is clinically central to tracking therapeutic progress.
- Verbal disclosures. Any verbal statements the child made that are clinically relevant — trauma disclosures, statements about family members, questions about safety — documented at a level of specificity appropriate to the chart. Not a verbatim transcript of every utterance; the clinician's clinical judgment governs what rises to the level of documentation.
- Safety observations. Mandated-reporting threshold materials: any statements or play themes suggesting abuse, neglect, suicidal ideation, or self-harm. Documented explicitly even when the threshold for reporting has not been reached, so the chart shows the clinician observed and assessed.
- Caregiver segment. If a parent, guardian, or caregiver was present for any portion — filial therapy, parent consultation at session end, check-in — what was discussed, what the caregiver reported, and any clinical observations about the parent-child interaction.
- Tie to treatment goals. How the session work connects to the goals in the treatment plan. Required for insurance billing, useful for clinical continuity, and the documentation element that auditors check first.
TherapyDraft's play therapy template structures the draft note around these elements, calibrated for the session type selected. A child-centered session draft foregrounds themes and material selection; a directive session draft foregrounds activity description and the child's engagement; a filial session draft is structured in two labeled segments. The draft is a starting point the clinician edits — clinical interpretation of play themes requires the therapist's direct observation judgment and is not something the model supplies independently.
Minor PHI and why it heightens the cloud-scribe vendor-record problem
HIPAA applies to minor PHI with additional complexity. Under the federal rule, parents and legal guardians generally have the right to access their minor child's medical records — but states can and do create carve-outs for certain sensitive information (mental health treatment records, reproductive health, substance use) that the minor may have sought and received without parental knowledge or consent. Play therapists working with children of separated or divorcing parents, children in foster care, or adolescent clients who have sought care confidentially navigate this complexity routinely.
The vendor-record problem is sharper for play therapy than for most adult therapy contexts:
A play therapy session involving a child typically contains accounts of what the child disclosed about their home environment, family members, and formative experiences that the play therapist would not document verbatim in the clinical note — the note reflects clinical observation and significance, not a transcript. A cloud AI scribe retains the verbatim audio of that session, independently of what the therapist chose to document. If legal process reaches the vendor — a custody dispute, a child protective proceeding, a divorce discovery order — the vendor's records are reachable through subpoena directed at the vendor as a separate legal entity. The practice's documentation decisions about what to include in the chart do not constrain what the vendor is required to produce from its own independently retained records.
For play therapists working with children from high-conflict families, this is not a hypothetical. Custody disputes routinely involve discovery requests for a child's therapy records. A therapist working with a child of divorcing parents may receive a subpoena for treatment records from the other parent's attorney — the therapist's response to that subpoena is governed by professional privilege, HIPAA, and state law protections. A subpoena directed at the cloud AI scribe vendor is a separate legal event, governed by different rules and directed at a party who has no professional relationship with the child or the family. See the subpoena explainer for the full analysis of how this works.
TherapyDraft eliminates the vendor-record problem at the architectural level. Session audio and transcripts never leave the Mac, so there is no vendor with independently retained records to subpoena. The clinical chart — held by the practice, protected by the therapist's professional duties and HIPAA — remains the single custody location for documentation of the child's treatment.
Supported play therapy modalities
TherapyDraft's play therapy documentation template supports the primary modalities in current practice:
- Child-centered play therapy (CCPT). Based on Carl Rogers' person-centered principles and developed by Garry Landreth and Virginia Axline. Nondirective — the child leads; the clinician tracks, reflects, and provides therapeutic conditions. Documentation foregrounds themes and material selection.
- Directive play therapy. The clinician chooses the activity, material, or structured exercise. Documentation foregrounds the activity rationale, the child's engagement and response, and the connection to treatment goals.
- Sandtray and sandplay. The child creates a scene in a sandbox using figurines. Documentation describes the scene created, themes present in the configuration, the child's affect and process during tray creation, and any verbal narrative the child offered.
- Filial therapy. Parent-child sessions where the parent is coached in play therapy skills. Documentation covers both the parent-child interaction segment and the coaching/debrief segment with separate clinical observations for each.
- Integrative and other. Theraplay, narrative play therapy, art-based approaches, puppet therapy, and integrated modalities. TherapyDraft's note template can be adapted for any modality where the session content is structured observation-plus-verbal rather than primary-verbal.
Play therapists as TherapyDraft's ICP
Registered Play Therapists (RPT) and those working toward the RPT credential through the Association for Play Therapy (APT) are a defined professional segment within TherapyDraft's ICP. Most hold underlying licensure as LCSW, LPC, LMFT, or PhD, and primarily work in private practice or small group settings. Billing rates for play therapy sessions range from $150 to $250 per session for cash-pay or out-of-network billing, with some practitioners accepting insurance for clients with anxiety, ADHD, trauma, or depression diagnoses.
Play therapists in private practice are disproportionately privacy-aware for the same reason EMDR-trained therapists are: the nature of their clinical work means the session content is sensitive material that their clients and families expect to stay contained within the clinical relationship. They are also independent clinicians who make their own tool decisions — no hospital procurement committee, no enterprise IT policy — which means the architectural-privacy argument reaches them directly.
The existing TherapyDraft blog content on what cloud scribes send to servers and whether AI notes can be subpoenaed is directly relevant to the play therapist audience because the scenario of a custody-dispute subpoena reaching a cloud scribe vendor maps onto the highest-anxiety scenario in their practice. TherapyDraft's architecture eliminates that scenario.
Pricing
Solo plan: $39/month or $349/year — unlimited play therapy session note drafts, all modality templates, all EHR paste presets, inference attestation log, one-shot template matching from your own example notes. Group plan: $29/seat/month for 3+ seats — Solo features plus shared template library. 10-session free trial, no credit card required. Full pricing breakdown on the pricing page.
Cloud alternatives for context: Mentalyc at $19.99+/mo, Supanote at $39/mo, Freed at $99/mo, Blueprint at $0.99/session. All cloud-based, all upload session audio to third-party infrastructure. TherapyDraft is the only option that keeps minor PHI session recordings on the clinician's own device throughout the documentation workflow.
Related questions
What elements does a play therapy progress note typically document?
A play therapy session note documents the modality used, the play themes that emerged, the materials the child selected and how they used them (clinically significant in child-centered approaches), the child's affect and regulatory capacity during the session, any verbal disclosures made by the child, safety-related observations, parent or caregiver participation if present, and the clinician's clinical observations tied to the treatment plan goals. Play therapy notes are typically observation-focused rather than transcript-driven — the clinical record reflects what the therapist observed and its meaning, not a verbatim account of what was said.
Why is minor PHI a heightened concern when using a cloud AI scribe for child therapy?
Minor clients have elevated HIPAA protections that adult clients do not. Play therapy session audio involving a child typically contains the child's spontaneous disclosures about family members, household dynamics, and formative experiences — material the therapist deliberately documents at a high level in the chart. A cloud AI scribe retains the verbatim audio as an independently subpoenable record outside the practice's own chart. In custody disputes, child protective proceedings, and divorce discovery — the contexts play therapists are most likely to encounter — that vendor-held record is reachable through legal process directed at the vendor, not the therapist. See the subpoena explainer for the full mechanics.
How does TherapyDraft handle the non-verbal nature of play therapy sessions?
Play therapy sessions are often less verbally dense than adult therapy sessions — the child may be primarily playing while the clinician observes and occasionally reflects. TherapyDraft's play therapy template is calibrated to produce an observation-focused draft from whatever audio is captured: play themes, materials used, the child's affect arc, and any verbal content that occurred. For sessions with minimal verbal exchange, the draft is shorter and observation-focused; the clinician adds clinical interpretation of the play themes in the review step, which is appropriate since that interpretation requires direct observation judgment that the AI does not supply.
Does TherapyDraft support filial therapy (parent-child) session documentation?
Yes. Filial therapy sessions are structured with the parent conducting play with the child while the therapist observes and coaches. TherapyDraft captures the full session and drafts a note structured around two segments: the parent-child interaction observation (play themes, parent's facilitation skills, child's response) and the coaching/debrief segment (feedback given, parent's response, next-step plan). The note is labeled as filial therapy so that reviewers understand the session structure.
Who is the ICP for play therapy documentation — what credentials do play therapists typically hold?
Registered Play Therapists (RPT) credentialed through the Association for Play Therapy (APT) are the most specialized segment, holding underlying licensure as LCSWs, LPCs, LMFTs, or PhDs. Play therapy is typically offered in private practice or small group settings, billing at $150–$250 per session for cash-pay or out-of-network clients. These clinicians are independent practitioners who make their own tool decisions and are disproportionately privacy-aware given the nature of working with minor clients in a trust-based therapeutic relationship.
Further reading
- How the network-sandbox entitlement works — the architectural guarantee
- On-device therapy note generator — Mac chip latency benchmarks
- AI DAP note generator — for play therapists who carry adult caseloads alongside child work
- TherapyDraft pricing — Solo and Group plan details
- Full pricing comparison — cloud scribes vs. TherapyDraft
- What a BAA actually covers — and what it doesn't
- Can an AI therapy note be subpoenaed?
- What cloud AI scribes actually send to their servers
- Mentalyc alternative — architectural comparison
- Join the private beta